MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254827890 · doi:10.4000/communication.7046

Philippe BONFILS, Philippe DUMAS et Luc MASSOU (dir.) (2015), TICE & multiculturalités. Usages, publics et dispositifs

2017· article· fr· W4254827890 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soufiane Rouissi

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ouvrage collectif dirigé par Philippe Bonfils, Philippe Dumas et Luc Massou porte l’ambition d’interroger la notion de multiculturalité au regard des rapports de celle-ci avec les technologies de l’information et de la communication pour l’enseignement. Il réunit les contributions de chercheurs de l’Europe et du pourtour méditerranéen (Algérie, Belgique, France, Italie Liban, Suisse et Tunisie) qui mènent leurs travaux scientifiques principalement dans le domaine des sciences de l’informat...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.344
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207