MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

León Rozitchner: un pensador latinoamericano del presente

2018· article· es· W4254845076 on OpenAlexaff
Óscar Ariel Cabezas

Bibliographic record

VenueDe Raíz Diversa Revista Especializada en Estudios Latinoamericanos · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious and Theological Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uno de los filósofos de mayor profundidad que han surgido en América Latina es, sin duda León Rozitchner. El reciente interés que ha suscitado su obra se debe a que fue uno de los pioneros en señalar la “cuestión cristiana”, como uno de los mayores temas a reflexionar sobre la relación entre política, economía y teología. Este trabajo ofrece una panorámica de la obra de Rozitchner poniendo énfasis en su peculiar manera de abordar el tema de la dominación dentro de un horizonte cristo-capitalista. De igual manera reflexiona sobre el proceso de construcción de una subjetividad servil dentro de los marcos de una teología política en lo que se denomina como una geofilosofía.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDe Raíz Diversa Revista Especializada en Estudios LatinoamericanosSame topicReligious and Theological StudiesFrench-language works237,207