MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4254873749 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/9y7ha

L'évolution moléculaire et la révolution génomique.

2017· preprint· en· W4254873749 on OpenAlexaff
Bf Lang, B. Paquin, G. Burger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTree of life (biology)GenomeEvolutionary biologyGenomicsHorizontal gene transferPhylogeneticsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular Evolution and the Genomics RevolutionMolecular phylogenies based on rRNA sequences have served a pivotal role in defining threemajor organismal domains, Archaebacteria, Bacteria and Eukaryotes and their branching pattern,the tree of life. However, particularly when systematically analyzing complete genomesequences, inconsistencies have emerged that are best explained by lateral transfer of geneticmaterial. Best known is the integration of bacterial genetic information into the nuclear genomeof the eukaryotic cells, during the transformation of α-proteobacterial and cyanobacterialsymbionts into mitochondria and chloroplasts. In addition, more recent evidence suggests thatalso the genomes of Eubacteria and Archaebacteria have a mixed heritage. The importance ofgenomics for further exploring the origin and evolution of living beings will be discussed: only aminute portion of the biological diversity on earth has so far been explored: the genomics era hasbarely begun.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProtist diversity and phylogeny→French-language works237,207→