MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254945145 · doi:10.3406/ahrf.2005.2751

Contrainte ou liberté économique ? Les représentants du peuple en mission et le ravitaillement de Paris en l'an III

2005· article· en· W4254945145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoercion (linguistics)RepealContext (archaeology)LegislaturePoliticsPolitical scienceHumanitiesCapital (architecture)SociologyEthnologyLawArtPhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Michel Biard, Coercion or Economic Liberty ? The People's Representatives on Mission and Supplying Paris in Year III This article reviews the action of the people's representatives charged with ensuring vital supplies to the capital in Year III. Faced with harsh economic and social realities, they obviously no longer operated in the same legislative context as their predecessors, especially after the repeal of the Maximum of Prices and Wages. The author provides a brief summary of their missions and some elements of comparison with those undertaken by deputies charged with a similar task in 1793-1794. Finally, the action of one of them, namely Barras, is cited as a significant example of those missionaries bent on establishing a social, not just a political order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it