Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laurence Senelick, Lovesick: Modernist Plays of Same-Sex Love, 1894-1925, reviewed by Thomas A. King Alan Sinfield, Out on Stage: Lesbian and Gay Theatre in the Twentieth Century, reviewed by Jill Dolan John M. Clum, Something for the Boys: Musical Theater and Gay Culture, reviewed by Stacy Wolf Jose Esteban Munoz, Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics, reviewed by Frederick Luis Aldama Caca Fusco, ed., Corpus Delecti: Performance Art of the Americas, reviewed by Lisa Wolford Bernth Lindfords, ed., Africans on Stage: Studies in Ethnological Show Business, reviewed by Nadine George-Graves John Conteh-Morgan and Tejumola Olaniyan, ed.,Drama and Performance, reviewed by Martin Orkin L. Dale Byam, Community i Motion: Theatre for Development in Africa, reviewed by Sandra L. Richardson Marcia Blumberg and Dennis Walder, eds., South African Theatre as/And Intervention, reviewed by Jane Plastow
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.506 | 0.498 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".