MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epilogue

2011· book-chapter· en· W4255002925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tyler Boulware

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Press of Florida eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCherokeeDemiseQuarter (Canadian coin)Settlement (finance)LocalismPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)Public administrationGeographySociologyHistoryArchaeologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wartime disruptions significantly undermined Cherokee localism, as widespread displacement forced Cherokees from different towns and regions into new interactions that challenged local insularities. Equally important, repeated militia invasions prompted Cherokees to recognize that towns made easy targets. The result was the dispersal of many villagers to isolated farmsteads. Individual and family choices relating to these new settlement patterns were bolstered by council policy. Cherokee leaders encouraged dispersed agricultural tracts by directing that Cherokee farms could not be within a quarter mile of each other. The demise of the town—at least as it was known among prior generations—was evinced in Cherokee treaties with the United States. A centralized and institutionally based government accordingly emerged to meet these threats. In the nineteenth century, the Cherokees strengthened the national council, established a National Committee, and elected a principal chief of the Cherokee Nation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6530.313

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Press of Florida eBooksSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207