Doléances, déclarations et pétitions, trois formes de la parole publique des femmes sous la Révolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Christine Fauré, Doléances, Declarations, and Petitions, three Forms of Public Expression of Women under the Revolution. The forms of protest used by women during the Revolution correspond to a social and political affirmation. From the doleance, imitative of official texts, at times a parody, to the individual and collective exercise of the right to petition, one notes an evolution in the codification of expression. The emergence of women's rights, defended by women, stemming from personal, often tragic situations, symbolizes a new relationship between femininity and power. However, the petitioners did not speak freely in the assemblies, and the letter to the legally constituted authorities, to be retained by the assembly, must conform to accepted protocols that normalize the content of their demands. From 1789 on, a new style of petition emerged, one that favored the evocation and expression of emotions rather than the art of demonstration. Popular with women of the people, « l'offrande patriotique » expresses the difficulty of employing a rationalistic style too far removed from their cultural values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".