Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2019), "Index", Stem-Professional Women’s Exclusion in the Canadian Space Industry (Critical Management Studies), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2059-65612019011 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited INDEX Academic literature, engineering and science, 37–40 Accommodation, 42, 102, 222, 242 Accusation, 100–101, 233 and confession, 14–15, 67, 71, 73, 78, 79 Adaptability, 170, 206, 237 Adjustment and adaptation, 60 Aerospace, 3, 28, 150, 163, 166, 179, 196, 248, 251 Alouette I, 2, 11, 31, 33–34 Anchor points attributed, 6, 9, 15, 18, 61, 70, 120, 121, 122, 123, 125, 132–133, 135, 137, 138–139, 142, 145, 148, 149, 153, 154, 155, 161, 167, 168. 182, 187, 193, 202–204, 206, 207–208, 210, 211, 213–214, 215, 216–224, 233–238, 240–242, 257–258 ‘The Bitch’, 134, 135, 155, 161, 202–204, 210, 234, 235, 236, 237, 240, 258 concept, 5, 14, 18, 51, 67–68, 71–72, 74, 76, 77–79, 256–257 ‘Control Engineer’, 140–141, 155, 172, 209–210, 212, 234, 237–238, 241 ‘Elite’, 121–123, 136, 138, 155, 168, 206, 234 ephemeral, 7, 14, 62, 75–76, 132, 138, 207, 233, 238, 240, 256–257 ‘Females are More Serious’, 134–135, 155, 161, 167, 202, 204, 234, 237, 240 ‘Girl Engineer,’, 151, 156, 187, 220–223, 235 ‘Girls Don’t Do Anything’, 151, 153–154, 156, 220–223, 238, 242, 258 ‘How can we count on you? You’re a woman, you have kids’, 146, 148–149, 156, 181, 217, 219, 234–235 Identity, 5, 8 Intersectional Feminism, 9, 10–11, 13, 72, 74–76, 114, 239, 256 ‘Is she Supposed to be Here?’, 151, 153–154, 156, 187, 220–221, 223, 238, 258 ‘The Leader’, 134, 136, 141, 155, 161, 202–205, 234 ‘Leader of Harem’, 143, 145, 156, 178, 214, 216, 234, 237 ‘The Mommy’, 143, 145, 156, 178, 213–216, 234, 258 ‘Not Very Serious’ or ‘You’re so Funny’, 136, 138, 155, 168, 206–209, 234, 236–237 ‘The Only Girl’, 120, 136, 138–139, 141, 148, 155, 168–169, 179, 206–207, 209, 214, 234, 236–238, 240 ‘On Probation’, 146, 148–149, 156, 182, 217, 242 range of, 5, 9, 15–16, 20, 79, 91, 103, 113–114, 118, 122, 126, 131–156, 159, 168, 201, 206, 209, 214, 217, 224, 233–234, 258 ‘The Secretary’, 16, 151, 153, 155, 187, 220, 222, 234, 238 ‘Time to Move On’, 140, 141, 156, 172, 209–211, 234, 236, 237, 241 ‘You are a [lower level] ENG and you travel?!’, 140–142, 150, 156, 172, 209, 213, 238, 241 ‘You’re like a dog… you need to be kept on a leash’, 146, 149–150, 156, 160, 181, 217–220, 234–235, 238, 242 Anti-male sentiment, 101 Anti-woman approach, 39 Arm-wrestling informal rule, 16, 43, 44, 104 Artificial intelligence (AI), 40–41 Autobiographies, 94 Bilingual, 116–118 Bilingualism, 15, 118 Quebecois (masculine)/Quebecoise (feminine), 61–62 Binary(ies), 3, 18, 37, 41, 54, 65, 67, 71–72, 74, 78, 101, 103, 106, 124, 132, 218, 235, 236, 237, 239, 241, 243, 244, 256 Boundaries, 4–5, 17, 27, 30, 44, 58, 107, 125–127, 160, 162, 175, 235–238, 256–257 cisgender-specific ordering, 160 critical sensemaking processes, 107 crossing and re-crossing, 99, 237 day-to-day social interactions, 4, 17, 27 of exclusion, 127, 234 navigating, 235–237 organizational, 162 overstepping, 202–203, 236 of ‘us’ vs ‘them’, 100, 126, 170 Canadian Employment Equity Legislations, 34–36, 41, 92, 102 Canadian Human Rights Act , 69, 101–102, 186, 197 Canadian military college system, 37 Canadian Space Agency (CSA), 11, 28, 29, 31–32, 34–37 Canadian Space Agency Act, 31 Canadian Space Industry, 3, 5, 9, 10–11, 13, 15, 18–19, 27, 30–33, 37, 40, 45, 51, 53–54, 70, 104, 113–114, 118, 120, 123, 125, 156, 159–197, 201, 206–209, 233, 235, 239, 243, 249–250, 256, 258, 263 forms of context, 159–197 stakeholder map, 32 Capital-cost risks, 29 Career management service, 36 Cause and effect, 213, 238–239 Cell of influence(s), 105–106, 114, 118, 120–121, 126, 159, 162, 164, 166, 168, 172, 175–176, 178, 181, 182, 187, 224, 237 Centrality of identity, 60, 62, 96, 105, 159, 171, 177, 212, 225, 231, 257 Cisgender, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 13–16, 52–53, 61–64, 66–67, 69, 94, 96, 105 ciswomen (and cismen), 39, 53, 179 and ethnicity, 100 feminine-ideal, 39, 91, 98, 125, 179, 181, 195–196, 207, 209, 214–215, 217–218, 237, 242–243 feminine physical appearance, 61 individual, 13 informal rule, 36–37, 40, 44 intersectionality, 73–77, 100–102 labor stratification, 98 masculine-ideal (norms), 30, 37, 38–39, 40, 44, 160, 177, 183, 187, 193–195, 209–210, 214–215, 217, 219, 237, 242 men, 114 occupational stratification, 37, 98 organizational exclusion, 264 practices, 44 standpoint concept, 53, 72 woman, 61 Class, 4, 7–8, 13–14, 18, 38, 52–53, 57, 62, 64, 67, 72–73, 75, 77, 98, 100, 142, 221, 234, 239 Cold War, 3, 4, 34, 166 Colonialism, 65, 92, 98, 103 Complex/complexity, 6, 7, 9, 13, 14, 15, 17, 42, 44, 59, 64–67, 69–71, 73–78, 98, 100–101, 103, 106, 107, 114–115, 118–122, 124, 131–132, 140, 155, 159, 173, 178, 216, 218, 231, 233, 235, 237, 255, 257 Cosmic Ray Section of the National Research Council (NRC), 31 Craft ethic, 38 Critical race theory/studies, 13–14, 63, 73 Critical sensemaking (CSM), 5–6, 8–11, 16–18, 19, 62, 78–79, 91–96, 102, 103–107, 113, 118, 119, 121–122, 124–126, 132, 159, 201, 202, 204–205, 207–208, 209–211, 214, 216, 217, 219–220, 223–224, 233, 235, 238, 243, 247, 256–257, 264 centrality of identity, 96, 105 dual ANTi-History and CSM framework, 96 enactment of the environment, 95 ethnocentric discourses, 96 extracted cues, 95, 107 finding and analyzing, 118–119 framework, 5–6, 17–18 heart-wrenching stories, 96 identity construction, 95, 107, 123 ongoing, 8, 94–95, 105, 107, 212 plausibility, 4, 8, 15–16, 20, 94, 95, 96, 102, 105, 118, 131, 138, 156, 159, 161, 162, 181, 197, 201, 203, 210 processes, 5–6, 8–10, 16–18, 19, 78–79, 95–96, 103–107, 112, 113, 125–126, 159, 201, 204–206, 207–209, 211–213, 215–216, 219–220, 222–224, 235, 238, 257–258 retrospective, 6, 8, 94–95, 107, 121, 125, 132, 137, 166, 204, 209, 220, 249, 251 social, 95 “Cultural blockage” rule, 185, 197, 217–218, 242, 255 Cultural imperialism, 99 Decision-making processes, 29 Defence Research Board (DRB), 31 Defence Research Telecommunications Establishment (DRTE), 31 De Havilland Aircraft Co. (Toronto), 31 Demographics, 10, 11, 14, 19, 33–37, 41, 69, 138, 160, 162–163, 168, 171, 174, 194–195, 205, 223, 248, 253 rule, 33–35, 41, 160, 162–163, 168, 171, 174 Depth of analysis, 68, 71–73 Dialectical force of oppression, 53 Disciplinary processes, 44, 55–56, 58, 78, 235, 246 Discontinuities, 61, 256 Discourses, 4–9, 27, 38, 41–45, 54–59, 61–62, 66–67, 69, 71–76, 78–79, 91–97, 102, 104, 106–107, 114, 121–126, 131–132, 138–139, 142, 146, 151, 155, 160, 162, 167, 172, 177, 187, 203, 206, 208, 213, 216, 219, 223–224, 231, 233–241, 243, 245–247, 256–259, 263–264 autobiographies, 93–94 discursive practices, 12, 15, 59, 74, 77, 79, 92 dominant ideas, 5–6, 9, 10, 12, 16–17, 19–20, 74, 103–107, 113, 119, 121, 126, 156, 159, 161, 167–168, 171–172, 177–178, 181–182, 186–187, 191–197, 201–204, 207, 209, 211, 214–215, 217, 219–220, 222, 224, 231, 233, 235, 237, 240, 242, 257–258, 264 knowledge, technology of, 58–59 myths, 93 narratives, 4–6, 8, 16–17, 19, 30, 42, 60–64, 71, 92–94, 100, 102, 104–105, 114, 115, 119–127, 131–133, 136, 138–139, 141, 144–145, 148, 152, 159–160, 162–164, 166–171, 174, 176, 179, 184, 186, 192, 197, 203–204, 207, 218–219, 234–236, 243–244, 247–252, 254–255, 256 narratives, stories, myths, and sagas, 92–94 political, 71, 74, 104 and power-relations, 61, 78–79 and sensemaking, 92 stories. See Story/stories Weickian and critical sensemaking, 94–96, 118–119 Discrimination, 7, 13–14, 41, 43, 71, 91–92, 99, 101, 107, 144, 161, 181, 201, 218, 233, 245 marginalization, 7, 14, 63–64, 70–72, 99–100, 103, 257 and oppression, 92 Discursive practices, 12, 15, 59, 74, 77, 79, 92 Diversity, 3, 7, 11, 73, 102, 120, 131, 187–188, 197, 221, 257–258 functional/utilitarian, 68–69 mega diversity discourse, 69 meso-discourse of diversity, 69 Domination, 19, 52–53, 55–56, 71, 96–103, 124, 234, 239, 243, 246–247 contemporary treatments of, 98–99 dividing practices (Foucault), 97–100, 103, 234 scientific classification (Foucault), 97, 99–100, 103, 234 subjectification (Foucault), 97, 99–100, 103, 105, 234 See also Systems of domination processes Double jeopardy, 63 École Militaire/École Polytechnique, 37 Economic determinism, 52, 72, 258 Elitism, 121–123, 170, 195, 206, 237 Emancipatory, 52–53 Emotional involvements/attachment, 62, 131, 133, 145, 172, 195, 207 Employment Equity Act/legislation, 34–36, 42, 92, 102, 180, 186, 197, 255 Employment Equity and Diversity Plan, 36 Employment Equity group(s), 34–36 Enactment, 44, 95, 107, 244–245 Engineer/engineering, 3–4, 6, 11, 15, 27, 33–35, 37–40, 45, 69, 94, 101, 115–117, 134, 140–143, 144–145, 151–153, 155, 160, 169, 172–173, 177, 179, 180, 181, 184, 187, 188–189, 192, 196–197, 206, 209–212, 214–216, 219–223, 234–235, 237–238, 241, 248 ‘Control’, 140–141, 155, 172, 209–210, 212, 234, 237–238, 241 Engineering-6 (ENG-6), 35 junior, 116–117, 140–143, 150, 162, 172, 178, 221 Epistemology, 10 Equality, 42, 68, 69, 101, 102–103, 106, 186, 245, 258 diversity, 69 outcomes in neoliberal terms, 258 Equity, 102–103 See also Canadian Employment Equality Act Eriksonian identity concept, 60, 71 construction, 60 selfsameness, 60, 101–102 Ethics of self-care, 56, 245–247, 256 Ethnic (identity), 4, 7, 13, 35, 40, 61–64, 66–67, 75, 77–78, 96, 98, 100–102, 114–116, 180, 234 Exclusion, 4–14, 16–17, 18, 19–20, 33, 35–36, 40, 51–52, 57, 64, 66, 69–74, 91–92, 96–107, 113–114, 121, 124–127, 159, 161, 197, 231, 233–243, 250–251, 254–258, 264 Exclusionary order and social justice initiatives limits/boundaries, 237–238 navigating boundaries, 235, 236–237 not a study of cause-and-effect, 238–239 range of anchor points, 233–235 recreating limits/boundaries, 235–236 resisting limits/boundaries, 237–238 social justice, 239–240 STEM-professional men, micro-political resistances, 242–256 STEM-professional women, micro-political resistances, 240–242 Executive(s) (EX), 4, 6, 11, 34–35, 96, 113, 115, 184, 254–255, 117, 126, 181–182, 186–187, 219, 223, 233 Experience of exclusion, 96–102, 103–104, 121, 124, 126, 161, 234–239 accusation, 100–101 anti-male sentiment, 101 cisgender labor stratification, 98 colonialism, 65, 92, 98, 103 dividing practices, 97–103, 234 domination, contemporary treatments of, 98–103 equality, 101–103, 106 equity, 92, 101–103 Foucault’s system of domination, 96–98, 103 Indigenous peoples/populations, 98–100 interlocking oppression, 99, 103 intersectionality knowledge, 99–103, 106 ‘isms,’, 98–99 marginalization, 99–100, 103 normalcy, 17, 100, 234 oppression, 91–92, 99, 103 racism, 65, 97–98, 103 repression, 96–98 scientific classification, 97, 99–100, 103 selfsameness, 101–102 sexism, 97–98, 103 social problems, 98 social struggles, 96–99 subjectification, 97–98, 100, 103, 105 systems of domination, 98–99 ‘womanhood,’, 100 Exploitation, 13, 69, 96, 98–99 Extracted cues, 95, 107 Face of war, 29 Feminine-cisgender physical appearance, 61 Feminine-ideal, 39, 91, 98, 125, 179, 181, 195–196, 207, 209, 214–215, 217–218, 237, 242–243 Feminisms, 13, 19, 51–53, 70, 72, 143–144 empiricist, 52, 72, 74 standpoint, 14, 51–53, 54, 64, 72, 73, 74, 239 Feminist, 13–14, 51–53, 63–66, 69–70, 72–73, 74–77, 79, 94, 101, 143–144, 171, 239, 243–244, 246 Formal rules, 31, 35–37, 42–43 Formative contexts, 5, 10, 17–18, 19, 27, 40–41, 43–44, 45, 55–56, 91, 103–104, 113, 119, 122–124, 126, 156, 159–160, 162, 164, 175, 179, 181, 187, 194–196, 201, 202–204, 209–210, 214–215, 224, 235, 246, 248, 256–257, 264 adaptable , 170, 195 “All women are glorified secretaries”, 183, 196 controlling space structures and women, 166, 194 dismissive, 184, 196 diversity in early career, 187–188, 197 elitism, 121–123, 170, 195 (embracing) feminine-ideal, 179, 181, 195 (embracing) masculine-ideal, 160, 177, 183, 187, 194, 195 feminine-ideal ‘acquiescing’, 195 (Get rid of the) “old White men”, 184–185, 197 “having the balls”, 184–185, 197 helping someone/nurturing and caring, 15–16, 105–106, 125, 127, 196, 243, 255–256 “human” (was not valued), 161, 172, 187, 190, 197 military, 3–4, 11, 15, 27, 29, 31, 37, 40, 142, 147, 179, 185, 194, 196, 238, 242 no value to multitasking, 175, 195, 210, 223 “old boys’ club”, 164, 194, 203, 240, 248–249 pornography, 145, 164–166, ’194, 249, 263 “pulling all aces”, 176, 195, 237–238, 242 resilience, 160, 182, 193, 194, 196 (STEM-professional men) winning awards, 175, 185, 195, 210, 218, 242, 256 targets for men’s teasing and ‘objects’ to be admired, 169, 183, 195, 206 trust, 161, 180–181, 188, 196, 214, 238, 242 uncertainties, 160, 182, 194, 196, 203–204, 246 ‘us’ vs ‘them,’, 170, 191, 194 We accept only certain people among us, 170, 195 Forms of context, 9–11, 18–20, 27–45, 119, 122–126, 159–197, 201–231, 233, 238 formative contexts. See Formative concepts meta-rules. See Meta-rules rules, 42–43 See also Rules Forms of experiences, 9–11, 16, 18–20, 44, 91–107, 119, 124, 127, 159–197, 201–230, 233–239 discourse, 92–94 discourses, critical sensemaking, and exclusion, 124–126 experience of exclusion, 96–102 research framework, 103–107 Weickian and critical sensemaking, 94–96 Forms of knowledge, 9–11, 11–16, 18–19, 51–79, 119–122, 123, 131–156, 201–231, 233–235 anchor points, 67–68, 77–79 feminisms, 51–53 intersectionality literature, 59–72 poststructuralism, 54–59 range of anchor points, 79, 91, 103, 118, 119–122 research framework, 74–79 Foucauldian forms. See Forms of context; Forms of experiences; Forms of knowledge Foucault ethic of self care, 56, 245–247, 256 forms, 9 norms, 54–55 See also Forms of context Régime des pratiques (system of practices), 12, 54–55, 59 self, 55–56, 61, 245 systems and processes of domination, 96–98 technology/technologies of discourses/knowledge, 58–59 technology/technologies of power-relations, 56–58 technology/technologies of self and subjection, 55–56, 61, 245 Four-dimensional power model, 56–58 Fragmented legitimized errors/truths, 12, 51, 54, 60–61 Functionalist, 13, 52, 239 Gender(less), 18, 27, 30, 37–38, 39, 65, 68, 69, 73, 75, 114, 120, 127, 131, 160–161, 178, 179, 181, 185, 194, 203–204, 209, 215, 218, 221, 222, 236–237, 238, 242–245, 252, 255–257 critical sensemaking (CSM) framework, 18 diversity and, 69 and diversity scholar/literature, 7, 68, 69, 120, 131, 257 identities and, 39 neutrality, 38–39, 212 occupational stratification, 27, 37, 38 oscillation, 185 stratification theory, 27, 37, 53, 67, 98, 179, 196, 214, 238 Gender-balanced cabinet, 114 Generalized theory of identity, 64, 66, 70, 73, 100 Global space industry, 27–30 Global space industry, stakeholders, 28 Gramscian hegemony, 52–53 Group of Seven (G7), 28–29 Group of Twenty (G20) countries, 28 Habermas’ power, 57–58, 59 Hegemony, 52–53 Heuristic(s), 10, 17–19, 96, 119 History/historical/the past, 3, 10, 11, 14–15, 17, 27, 30, 35, 37, 51, 54, 55–56, 58, 59, 60, 62, 65–66, 68, 70, 76, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98, 100–101, 105–106, 119, 127, 131, 142, 145, 166, 172, 203, 207, 234, 246 Hybridity, 64, 71 Identity/identities, 5–10, 13–17, 18–19, 35, 38–40, 55–56, 59–69, 94–102, 104–107, 113, 115–117, 119–121, 131–133, 159, 233–235, 252, 254, 256, 257 concepts, 60–68, 101 construction, 60, 62, 95, 107, 123, 132 dualism, 40 and Foucauldian subject/self, 55–56, 60–61 intersectionality/intersecting, 63–72, 76–79, 114–115, 122–123, 237, 239 map of, 134, 136, 140, 143, 146, 151 qualified/professional., 38, 142, 210, 218 relationality and anchor points, 14, 65, 67–68, 70, 73, 78–79, 256 self, 6–7, 16, 35, 39, 60–63, 66, 71, 75–79, 104, 106, 107, 115, 120–122, 131–133, 136, 138–139, 144, 146–147, 149, 152, 154–155, 160, 161, 167, 171, 202, 204, 237 social-identity, 6, 15, 39, 61–62, 66, 73, 75–77, 97, 120–121, 131–133, 135, 137, 140, 145, 148, 167, 204, 238 sociological perspective on, 61–63, 66 temporal, 61 work, 61–62, 76 Ideologies, 15, 38, 51–52, 58, 62, 65, 75, 105, 131, 133, 137, 140, 179, 244 Indigenous populations/peoples, 98, 100 Individual complex, 6, 14–15, 44, 67, 69–71, 74–75, 77, 100, 103, 107, 113, 115, 118–122, 131–132, 155, 233 Inequality, 53, 65–66, 67, 101, 142 Informal masculine ideal rule, 43 Informal rules, 30, 36, 37, 40, 42–43, 44 Intentionality, 18 Interactional/masculinist studies, 39–40 Interlocking oppression, 99, 103 International partnership, 29 International Space Station (ISS), 29 Intersecting identities, 5, 7, 8, 63–64, 66, 70, 77, 79, 114, 116, 122, 161–162, 239 Intersectional feminism, 9, 10–16, 51, 72, 74–76, 114, 239, 256 and, Foucault’s system of practices, 74 poststructuralism, 74 19–20, 51, 54, 73, 76–79, 103, 106, 113, 121–122, 233, 257–258 analysis, 66 and anchor points, knowledge, 99 66, 71 literature, 59–72 anchor points concept, 5, 8, 14, 67–68, 71, 73, 77–79 concepts of, 5, 7–8, 13–16, 66, 73, diversity, 68–69 identity 7–8, 14–15, 75, 77, 102, 113, 234 jeopardy, 63 knowledge and, power 63, 65–66, individual, 53, 64, 70, 72, 73 relationality and anchor points, of, 4, 64, 66, 73 7, 10, 14, 20, 40, 59, 69–70, 77, 79, 106, 257–258 98–99 Space Agency 28, 29, 32 classification, 29 38, 92, 101–102, 122, 180, 186, 197, 255, 258 4–5, 17, 74, 107, 125, 186, 197, 255, 257 and 11, 28, 34–35, 166 and , 38 38, 39 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 51–53, 69, 96, 104, 107, 113, 174, 181, 185, 205, 223–224, 231, 233, 250–251, career, 36 34–35, 30, 244 of identities, 19, 121–122, 123, 126, 132, 134, 136, 138, 140, 141, 143, 146, 148, 151 7, 14, 63–64, 70–72, 99–100, 103, 257 See also of 37 30, 37–40, 44, 160, 177, 183, 187, 194–196, 209–210, 214–215, 217, 219, 237, 242 242, and 11, 28, 34–35, 166 identity construction, 8, 62, 79, 98, 104, 123, 133, 204, 239 of diversity, 69 6, 8, 9–11, 17, 19, 27, 29, 31, 36, 67, 68, 78, 91, 95, 99, 104, 107, 119, 122, 202–203, 206, 208, 220, 222–224, forms of context, 122–123, STEM-professional women, critical sensemaking framework, forms of context, forms of experiences, 124–126 forms of knowledge, 119–122 and and research STEM-professional men, resistances, 6, 13, 19–20, 106–107, 127, 256, 3, 4, 11, 15, 27, 31, 37, 40, 142, 147, 179, 185, 193, 195, 209, 214, 217, 238, 242 men, 4, 11, 37, 40 11, 28, 197, 29, 170 jeopardy, 63 range of anchor points, 102 stories, myths, and sagas, 102, and Space 4, 31–32, 40, 153, 191, 194 and marginalization, masculine-ideal, 30, 160 69 women 29, 131, 43 12, 17, 53, 99, 100, 101, 103, 192, 214, 222, 234 39 of power, 13, 63, 66, 73 13, 14, 53, 64, 66, 71, 74, 91, 92, 99, 103 force of, 53 and 14, 91, 92, 99 99, 103 See also Systems of and 14, 67, 71, 73, 78, 79, 100, 233 14, 63, dominant 39 4–5, 8, 10, 16, 33, 66, 73, 264 identity and, social, 4–5, 13–14, 16, 44, 63, 67, discourses, 6, myths, 93 53, 65, 66, 98 31, 41, 6, 37, 39 13, 71 feminism, 13, 9, 19, 51, 53, 54–59, 60, 63, 72, 74–75, 256 discourses/knowledge, technology of, 58–59 power technology of, 56–58 self and subjection, technology of, 3, 4, 18, 37, 71, 74–75, 118 13 18, 52, 99, 145, 237 model, 56–58 99 14, 51, 71, 78, 127, 233, 256 57, 71, 78, 124, 126, 132, 138, 214, 218, 243, individual, 13, 18, 70, 72, 73, 98, 106, 242 and 11, 38–39, 113–114, 142, 210 40–41 cisgender 65, 97–98, 103 Co. 31 15, 54, 61, 104–105, 121, Régime des pratiques (system of practices), 12, 54, 59 14, 18, 65, 67–68, 70, 73, 78, 79, 256 44, 96–98 Research framework, 9 forms of context, 11, forms of context, of knowledge and of experiences, forms of experiences, 103–107 forms of knowledge, 16–17, 74–79 Research critical sensemaking (CSM) framework, forms of context, forms of experiences, 124–126 forms of knowledge, 119–122 and and research STEM-professional men, 12, 18–19, 52, 62, 73, 74–75, 93, 96, 101, 104–107, 124, 155, 203, 204, 208, 214, 216, 236, 238 6, 13, 19–20, 106–107, 127, 256, norms, 56, 67, 106, 245, 247, 256 4, 30, 93 5–6, 8–10, 17–18, 19, 45, 55–56, 62, 67, 73, 78, 91, 95, 97, 103–107, 113, 119, 121, 122–124, 126, 132, 156, 202–203, 206–207, 209–210, 214, 217–218, 252, 256–259, 264 in 170, 195 cisgender 177, 195, 210 cisgender 36–37, cisgender stratification, 27, 37, 179, 196, 214, 238 cisgender 176, 183, 195, 196, 209–210, occupational 196, 217–218, 242 185, 197, 217–218, 242, 255 33–35, 41, 160, 162–163, 168, 171, 174, 194 171, 194 168, 170, 195, engineering ethic, 38, 188, 197, 221 42–43 feminine-ideal, 39, 91, 98, 125, 179, 181, 195–196, 207, 209, 214, 215, 217–218, 237, 242–243 27, 30, 31, 33–37, 40, 42–43 of space 162, 166, 194, 203, 240 the balls”, 184–185, 197, 218, 237, 242, STEM-professional women, 196, 221, 222, 240 27, 30, 36–37, 40, 161, 180, 186, 194–195, 197, 210, 221, 242, 252, 255, to be 184–185, 197, 218, of 186, 197, 255, 257 30, 38–39, 40, 44, 160, 177, 183, 187, 194–196, 209, 210, 214, 215, 217, 219, 237, 242 need to be 170, 195, 206–207, 240 no trust, 188, 197 order of 180–181, 195, 29, 162, 194, 4, 33, 194, 204, 240, 248 36, 176, 183, 195–196, 209–210, only 169, 171, 179, 195–196, 206–207, 161, 180, 181, 196, 214, 238, 242 27, 42–43 123, 170, 195 27, 42–43 of 29 29 92–94, 102 3, 54, 60, 71, 101–102 organizational 115, 118, STEM-professional women, and narratives, classification (Foucault), 97, 99–100, 103, 234 and subjection, technology of, 55–56, 61, 246 ethic of, 60, 101–102 13, 65, 97–98, 103, 201, 251 235, 264 (Toronto), 31 context, 8, 65, 67, 79 determinism, 14, 53, 65, 66, 67, 101, 142 interactions, 4, 11, 17, 19, 27, 40, 41, 43–44, 56, 58, 60, 63, 67, 69, 71, 75, 77–79, 92, 95, 104, 119, 132, 162, 193, 203, 209–210, 217, 220, 224, 231, 235, 247, 252, 257–258 justice, 13, 65, 67, 106, 127, 233, 6, 8, 10, 18, 19, 27, 67, 78, 105, 122–124, 159–160, 179, 181, 202, 206, 217, 224, 231, 233, 249, 257 6, 15, 39, 61–62, 66, 73, 75–77, 97, 120–121, 131–133, 135, 137, 140, 145, 148, 167, 204, 238 of 8 processes, 4, 5, 94, 96, 113, 159, 201, Space 10, 11, 19, 27, 51, 69, 138, 168, 171, 174, 223, 248, 253 space industry, 27–30 Canadian space industry, and rules, 10, 11, 19, 27 Alouette I, Canadian Space Agency and organizational Aerospace, 31, 166 11, 28, 95 rule, 4, 33, 194, 204, 240, 248 51–53, 54, 63, 72–73, 74, 239 of 56, 72, 78, 124, 217, of 13, 53–54, 61, 74, 78, 97, 99, 101, 104, 107, 124, 224, 239, 257 65, 71, 106, 114, 119, 166, 224, 264 STEM-professional 13, 15, 19, 43, 78, 114, of 105, 114, 153, 174, 193, 195, micro-political resistances, STEM-professional 4–6, 13, 15, 19, 20, 33, 36, 53, 61, 72, 76, 79, 113–114, 125–127, 244, 263–264 of 105–106, 118, 120–121, 224, 237 early career, exclusion, 233–239 identities, career, micro-political resistances, career, 4–6, 8, 15, 16–17, 19, 61, 62, 70, 92–94, 104, 114–115, 124, 127, 131, 133, 134–135, 142, 145, 150, 153–154, 159, 160, 171, 174, 175, 177, 179, 181, 185, 203–204, 211–213, 215–216, 218, 219–220, 223–224, 234, 235, 236, 243–244, 254–255, 256 92, 94, 96, 105, 121, 133, 179, social 7, 59, 64, 67, 72–73, 74, 96–98, 100, 103, 107, 239, 245–247, 257–258 97–98, 100, 103, 105, 234 10, 60, 62, 71 Systems of domination, 98–99 Systems of oppression, See also 4, 38–39, 42, 182, 209, (Foucault), 12, 54–55, of discourses/knowledge, 58–59 of power-relations, 56–58 of self and subjection, 55–56, 61, 245 identity, 61 14, 63–64, 73 of marginalization, 64, 70, 99, 103 See also power model, 8, 64, 65, 70, 114, jeopardy, 63 of power, 6, 115, 118, theory of discourse, 58–59 39, 203, 63, 75, 99, 8, 17–18, 62, 91, 93, 94–96, 102, 107, 119, See 7, 14, 15, 54, 74, 76, 95, 107, 120, 121, 133, 143, 144, 146, 149, 151, 159, 167–168, 194, 236, 241, 263 7, 14, 54, 62, 74, 76, 107, 120, 121, 133, 138, 149, 159, 241 100 34, 35 29, 160, 194 11, 28 Forms of Forms of Forms of Research STEM-professional Women’s of Anchor Canadian Space Forms of and STEM-professional Women’s and 8 STEM-professional Women’s Anchor and Forms of and Forms of 9 the of Exclusionary and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.131 | 0.131 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".