MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255116858 · doi:10.1515/iupac.53.0026

Development and Evaluation of Simplified Approaches to Residue AnalysisAll correspondance should be addressed to the Secretary, R. Greenhalgh, CBRI, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, K1A OC6, Canada.

2016· dataset· en· W4255116858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. Bátora, S. Vitorović, H. P. Thier, M. A. Klisenko

Bibliographic record

VenueIUPAC Standards Online · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatographyResidue (chemistry)ChemistryPesticideTriazineCarbamateEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceBiologyOrganic chemistryAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

– Simplified analytical methods are reviewed for pesticide residues and their metabolites. One criteria used in their selection was their suitability for screening food and environmental samples. Currently, thin layer chromatography is the most practical technique. It can detect organochlorine, organophosphorus and carbamate insecticide residues together with those of phenoxy, triazine and urea herbicides. Comparative data on the accuracy of thin layer chromatographic and gas chromatographic methods is also given. The former is shown to be a very useful multiresidue procedure for identification as well as quantitation of most important classes of pesticides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUPAC Standards OnlineSame topicPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyFrench-language works237,207