MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255137746 · doi:10.1002/9781119960027.ch10

Reality Sensing

2011· other· en· W4255137746 on OpenAlexaff
Kieron O’Connor, Frederick Aardema

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistrustAestheticsReality checkReality tvAugmented realityVirtual realityPsychologyEpistemologyComputer scienceSociologyHuman–computer interactionArtPhilosophyMedia studiesPsychotherapistTest (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: The Cross-Over Away from Reality Falsehood of Obsessions Going Against Reality When Reality Gets in the Way Alternative Stories Doubt Distrust Versus Reality Sensing Learning to Trust What the Senses do not Say Reality Sensing Overuse of the Senses Helping the Client to Let Go of the Doubt and Trust the Senses Helping the Client Let Go of Extra Effort

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.399
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.049 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207