Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1956, BBC producer D.G. Bridson visited St. Elizabeths Hospital to record Ezra Pound reading from his poems. Pound began one of the taping sessions with a monologue in which he described the “four steps” that had led to his incarceration. The first step had been his quarrel with an American passport official in Paris who had tried to interfere with his return to London in 1919. The second was being told that an American judge had declared: “In this country there ain't nobody has got any goddamned rights whatsoever.” The third was the boast of a prosecuting attorney: “All that I’m interested in is…seeing what you can put over.” The fourth and final step was learning from Senator Burton Wheeler in 1939 of President Roosevelt's effort to “pack” the Supreme Court. That was where Pound “took off from.” “When the Senator is unable to prevent breaches of the Constitution…the duty, as I see it, falls back onto the individual citizen. And that is why…when I got hold of a microphone in Rome, I used it” ( ASC , 823–5). The “four steps,” with their fairy-tale causality, are a distilled chronicle of Pound's disenchantment with America and liberal democracies. Like his encapsulation of economic wisdom in the slim broadside he called Introductory Textbook (in Four Chapters) , Pound's “four steps” seek to elucidate a world of complexity with the simplicity of a village explainer. Each of the “steps” purports to document a perversion of law by a tainted official: a desk jockey in the passport office for whom red tape was a religion; a judge whose sense of legal realism had declined into cynicism; a district attorney who flaunted prosecutorial indiscretion; a ruthlessly pragmatic chief executive keen to abuse his power of judicial appointment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.069 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".