MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255162319 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zjtqa

MILLENIAL INDONESIA: Diskursus Wacana, Identitas, dan Ruang Publik

2019· preprint· id· W4255162319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Methods
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamPhilosophySociologyLinguisticsHumanitiesPsychologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Buku ini adalah kumpulan tulisan dari tugas mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Agama Islam, yang di ampu oleh Arif Rahman, M.Pd.I. Editor oleh Arif Rahman dan Zalik Nuryana. Para penulis adalah mahasiswa Dwi Tri Astuti, Dkk. Buku ini berisi tentang sentilan ringan namun bermakna terhadap fenomena sosial di masyarakat. Berbagai nalar dan perspektif diangkat dalam buku ini yang menggambarkan khasanah gaya anak muda berfikir, menganalisis dan mengutarakan gagasan dari sudut pandang yang mungkin bisa tak terpikirkan. Selamat membaca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Research and MethodsFrench-language works237,207