MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W425517428 · doi:10.1628/978-3-16-158813-6

Unternehmensmitbestimmung, Corporate Governance und der Deutsche Corporate Governance Kodex

2020· book· de· W425517428 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole Gietzen

Bibliographic record

VenueMohr Siebeck eBooks · 2020
Typebook
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsMitel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate governanceBusinessPolitical scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Co-determination, i.e. the representation of employees on the supervisory board, is a unique feature of German industrial relations. The German Corporate Governance Code aims at illustrating the German corporate governance system. Nicole Gietzen identifies inconsistencies and discrepancies between the co-determination laws and the Code and argues that the co-determination gap of the Code needs to be closed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMohr Siebeck eBooksSame topicCorporate Governance and LawFrench-language works237,207