MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255190923 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.8051921

Spherical-Shape Assumption for Protein–Aptamer Complexes Facilitates Prediction of their Electrophoretic Mobility

2019· preprint· en· W4255190923 on OpenAlexaff
Stanislav S. Beloborodov, Svetlana M. Krylova, Sergey N. Krylov

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectropherogramAptamerElectrophoresisProtein detectionMobilitiesElectrophoretic mobility shift assayChemistryChromatographyMaterials scienceMolecular biologyNanotechnologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pdf file describes the results of this study, which aims at developing a model to accurately predict electrophoretic mobilities of protein–aptamer complexes. The excel file contains source data for electropherograms (signal vs time) which were obtained in this study and used to determine the migration times and electrophoretic mobilities of proteins, aptamers, ssDNAs, protein–aptamer complexes, and protein–ssDNA complexes. Additional sheets in the excel file contain values of all migration times and mobilities obtained from the electropherograms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207