MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255220943 · doi:10.1109/pads.2004.1301281

Performance of a mixed shared/distributed memory parallel network simulator

2004· article· en· W4255220943 on OpenAlexafffund
C. Kiddle, R. Simmonds, B. Unger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsComputer scienceShared memoryMessage passingDistributed memoryDistributed shared memoryParallel computingData diffusion machineUniform memory accessLatency (audio)Memory managementDistributed computingOperating systemSemiconductor memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Designing fast parallel discrete event simulation systems for shared-memory parallel computers is simplified by the efficient communication operations enabled by the common memory space. The difficulties involved in designing large shared-memory computers and the resulting high cost of even modest size systems has led to the proliferation of computer systems consisting of small shared-memory computers connected via low-latency message-passing interconnection networks. This paper describes how a network simulation system using a simulation kernel optimized for high performance operation on shared-memory parallel computers has been extended to operate on computers that mix shared-memory and message-passing paradigms. Results are presented showing that the system can achieve over 60 million simulated packet transmissions per second on 32 4-processor nodes. The results demonstrate the advantage of using a mixture of shared-memory and message-passing over using only message-passing in many cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207