MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255227163 · doi:10.1002/cne.23135

Distribution and functional organization of glomeruli in the olfactory bulbs of zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>)

2012· article· en· W4255227163 on OpenAlexafffund
Oliver Braubach, Alan Fine, Roger P. Croll

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsDanioZebrafishBiologyCalretininOlfactory bulbOlfactory marker proteinOlfactory systemAnatomyCalbindinNeuroscienceOlfactory epitheliumCentral nervous systemImmunohistochemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The cover image shows the paired olfactory bulbs of an adult female zebrafish (Danio rerio). The image was obtained through a novel in toto immunohistochemistry protocol explained in Braubach, Fine and Croll in this issue. The tissue was labeled with antibodies against the molluscan blood protein, keyhole limpet hemocyanin (red), and the calcium binding protein, calretinin (green). Axons that enter the olfactory bulbs via the olfactory nerve (bottom) converge on different target areas, which differ in their neurochemistry and the numbers and morphologies of olfactory glomeruli contained within each region. J. Comp. Neurol. 520:2317–2339, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207