MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255261866 · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.11

Dermatopathology

2010· article· en· W4255261866 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Pathology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreQueen's UniversityUniversity Health NetworkCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDermatopathologyPathologyMedicineDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Estrogen has been known to be involved in development and/or progression of tumor cells arising in several organs including breast, endometrium, ovary, and others.Human skin is also considered the target organs of estrogens, which play some roles in the age-related dermal changes.In primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin, past history of burn and irradiation have been in general considered one of the important local carcinogenetic factors.In normal skin, fibroblasts in dermis have been demonstrated to express aromatase, one of the estrogen-producing enzymes, has also been proposed based on these findings but their details remain unknown.These injuries to skin above may also be considered to result in the disruption of estrogenrelated physiological functions of the skin, which cause tumor.In this study, we therefore examined whether estrogen receptor (ER) α, ERβ and aromatase are expressed in SCC of the skin or not.Design: Forty-eight cases (male: female 33:15, age range 44-99 yo.) with primary SCC of the skin were retrieved for imuunohistochemical study of ERα, ERβ, aromatase and Ki67.The specimens had been all fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution and embedded in paraffin.Serial tissue sections were used for hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry, performed by LSAB method.Nuclear immunoreactivity for ERα and ERβ was evaluated in 500 cancer cells, and the percentage of positive cells was subsequently obtained.Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for armoatase with more than 10% of carcinoma cells was defined as "positive ".Ki67 labeling index was also obtained by counting 500 carcinoma cells.The statistical calculations, STATA version 7 (College Station, Texas) was used.P value under 0.05 was considered significant.Research protocols for this study were approved by Ethics Committee at University School of Medicine.Results: ERα, ERβ and aromatase were positive in 93.75% (45/48 cases), 97.9% (47/48 cases) and 58.3% (28/48 cases), respectively.The positive rate of ERα among aromatase-positive cases was significantly higher among aromatse-negative cases (p<0.05,Mann-Whitney test).The age of aromatase-positive cases was significantly younger than aromatase-negative ones (p<0.05,Mann-Whitney test).Conclusions: These results suggest that the combined expression of ERα and aromatase could be related to carcinogenesis and/or progression of SCC of human skin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2320.108

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern PathologySame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207