MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255289940 · doi:10.1177/17557380211021002

Wheezy children

2021· article· en· W4255289940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paulina Cecula, Ioanna Zimianiti

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovAiT Education and inspiration for general practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWheezeMedicinePediatricsQuarter (Canadian coin)AsthmaInternal medicineHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wheeze is one of the most common presentations in children, with evidence that up to half of all children experience an episode by 6 years of age. Wheezing is transient in the majority of cases; however, some children develop recurrent symptoms. Different phenotypes have been recognised based on symptoms patterns, physiologic measurements and risk factors. Childhood wheezing is particularly relevant to general practice, as about a quarter of pre-school-aged children present with wheeze annually. This article aims to explain the pathophysiology and differential diagnoses of wheezing, focusing on common presentations of wheeze that can be managed in the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovAiT Education and inspiration for general practiceSame topicPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207