MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255330469 · doi:10.1017/s1740355312000290

AST volume 10 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

2012· paratext· en· W4255330469 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce Kaye, Thomas D. Eliot, Kenneth Kramer, Frederick D. Quinn, James B. Gould

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Anglican Studies · 2012
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Action (physics)Content (measure theory)Environmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsMechanical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

be numbered consecutively and include captions which identify the source of any image or data. Authors are responsible for obtaining and paying for all copyright and reproduction charges. Preferred formats for fi gures are tif or eps fi les, jpegs can also be accepted for photographs (halftones), but these may not print as well as you expect. If text labels are required as part of the jpeg halftone it should be imported into illustration software for labelling and saved as an eps fi le. All fi les must be a minimum of 300 dpi (dots per inch) for halftones, 600 dpi for combination fi gures and 1200 dpi for line art (black and white). Colour fi les must be supplied as CMYK (not RGB) at a minimum resolution of 300 dpi. Note that the image size must be no smaller than the size at which it will appear in the journal. Please do not submit your fi gures embedded into Word documents as the quality will be severely degraded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8760.882

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Anglican StudiesSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207