MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255330469 · doi:10.1017/s1740355312000290

AST volume 10 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

2012· paratext· en· W4255330469 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Anglican Studies · 2012
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Action (physics)Content (measure theory)Environmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsMechanical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

be numbered consecutively and include captions which identify the source of any image or data. Authors are responsible for obtaining and paying for all copyright and reproduction charges. Preferred formats for fi gures are tif or eps fi les, jpegs can also be accepted for photographs (halftones), but these may not print as well as you expect. If text labels are required as part of the jpeg halftone it should be imported into illustration software for labelling and saved as an eps fi le. All fi les must be a minimum of 300 dpi (dots per inch) for halftones, 600 dpi for combination fi gures and 1200 dpi for line art (black and white). Colour fi les must be supplied as CMYK (not RGB) at a minimum resolution of 300 dpi. Note that the image size must be no smaller than the size at which it will appear in the journal. Please do not submit your fi gures embedded into Word documents as the quality will be severely degraded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3870.703

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it