Mechanical Brides and Vampire Squids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One has to enquire into the ontological status of apparatuses, their level of existence. They are indubitably things that are produced, i.e. things that are pro-duced (brought forward) out of the available natural world. The totality of such things can be referred to as culture. Vilém Flusser, Towards a Philosophy of Photography [M]an in the normal use of technology (or his variously extended body) is perpetually modified by it and in turn finds ever new ways of modifying his technology. Man becomes, as it were, the sex organs of the machine world. Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media While there is much that divides Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980) and Vilém Flusser (1920-1991), the confluence afforded by the prospect of discussing them together allows us to consider what I suggest is a central strand of connection, namely their tendency to understand media as embodied , which is to say, as having a relationship with bios . This is a paradoxical dimension of their work, however, because the element of embodiment is configured according to a principle of alienation , such that the closer our relationship to media becomes, the further we get from the classic notion of the sovereign self. McLuhan had expressed this paradox through the notion of extension and amputation. Flusser, characteristically, expressed the paradox within a philosophical idiom, describing bios as a system of networks that mark a process of estrangement. The paradoxical dimension of these media theorists’ work derives from their experiences of what I have elsewhere called a cultural geography , one which was characterised by a profound sense of displacement that became a key element of the work they produced. Flusser, who fled the Nazis and ended up spending much of his career in Brazil, meditated often on the notion of the bodenlos , which expresses the vertiginous experience of immigration, the experience of never quite arriving— what V.S. Naipaul described as The Enigma of Arrival , which is that, as an immigrant, you never quite do. McLuhan, for his part, experienced the (far less traumatic but none the less real) lostness of the colonial citizen, at once a British Subject and a Canadian—and a Western Canadian at that, far from the centre of political, social and cultural power in Ontario—and therefore neither British, nor fully Canadian, and he characteristically referred to Canada as a ‘borderline’ case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".