Bibliographic record
Abstract
Michael M. Brescia and John C. Super, North America: An Introduction, reviewed by Angelika E. Sauer Chad Reimer, Writing British Columbia History, 1784–1958, reviewed by Donald Wright Stephen Manning, Quebec: The Story of Three Sieges; A Military History, reviewed by John R. Grodzinski J.I. Little, Loyalties in Conflict: A Canadian Borderland in War and Rebellion 1812–40, reviewed by Phillip Buckner Catharine Anne Wilson, Tenants in Time: Family Strategies, Land, and Liberalism in Upper Canada, 1799–1871, reviewed by Michel Ducharme Peter C. Bischoff, Les débardeurs au port de Québec: tableau des lutes syndicales, 1831–1902, reviewed by Robert C.H. Sweeny Douglas C. Harris, Landing Native Fisheries: Indian Reserves & Fishing Rights in British Columbia, 1849–1925, reviewed by Daniel Marshall and Michael Blackwell G.P. Browne and Janet Ajzenstat, eds., Documents on the Confederation of British North America, reviewed by Jarett Henderson Andrew Iarocci, Shoestring Soldiers: The 1st Canadian Division at War, 1914–1915, reviewed by Stephanie Cousineau Michael Small, The Forgotten Peace: Mediation at Niagara Falls, 1914, reviewed by Christine A. Berkowitz Michael K. Carroll, Pearson's Peacekeepers: Canada and the United Nations Emergency Force, 1956–1967, reviewed by Colin McCullough Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Approaches to Politics, reviewed by Christo Aivalis Donald J. Savoie, I'm from Bouctouche, Me, reviewed by Joel Belliveau Jeff A. Webb, The Voice of Newfoundland: A Social History of the Broadcasting Corporation of Newfoundland, 1939–1949, reviewed by Bill Parenteau Ryan Edwardson, Canuck Rock: A History of Canadian Popular Music, reviewed by Bart Testa
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.370 | 0.369 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".