Letters to the Editor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colonialism, as Ann Laura Stoler and Frederick Cooper have pointed out, is often a multilayered process resisting “Manichean” binaries of the metropolitian masters, on the one hand, and the colonized subjects of the imperial periphery, on the other. Along with the structuring of subordination also come complicating subtleties, including histories of close geographical neighbors in which the dominant and the less powerful necessarily interact along various axes, some of which cut through doubled internal experiences of colonization. This is most emphatically the case in terms of the United States and Canada. Especially since the 1960s, it has been commonplace for Canadians to critique the ways in which the United States has “taken over” their culture, institutions of higher learning, natural resources, and material life. Such responses to the hegemony of the “Americans” and the peculiarities of the “Canadians” may well err in an overly nationalistic sense of indignation, but there are grains of truth (economic, cultural, and intellectual) in these views.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".