MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255408253 · doi:10.14740/jmc3254

Syphilitic Hepatitis: An Uncommon Manifestation

2019· article· en· W4255408253 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Leila Cardoso, Rúben Carvalho, Rui Caetano Oliveira, Ana Gameiro, Eduardo Rabadão, José Saraiva da Cunha, Armando Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSyphilisMucocutaneous zoneTreponemaHepatitisDermatologySerologyPathologyImmunologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)DiseaseAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Syphilis is a systemic disease caused by the transmission through sexual contact of Treponema pallidum . It has a high incidence in men who have sex with other men, and is associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The diagnosis depends on serological tests or confirmation of the spirochete in histological samples. The primary lesion courses after a latency period of 2 to 6 weeks, and the secondary disseminated phase, usually associated with mucocutaneous lesions and lymphadenopathy, may involve any organ. Symptomatic syphilitic hepatitis is a rare manifestation, the diagnosis of which is a challenge. It is characterized by a marked elevation of alkaline phosphatase, moderate elevation of transaminases, and no bilirubin changes. Histologically, portal inflammation and non-caseous granulomas predominate without associated necrosis. The case described is a rare manifestation of secondary syphilis, in the form of hepatitis in a sexually active HIV-infected patient with good response to the recommended benzathine penicillin treatment. J Med Cases. 2019;10(7):222-223 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3254

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicSyphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207