Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine to machine (M2M) communication has received increasing attention in recent years. A M2M network exhibits salient features such as large number of machines/devices, low data rates, delay tolerant/sensitive, small sized packets, energy-constrained and low or no mobility. A large number of M2M terminals may exist in a small area with many trying to simultaneously and randomly access for channel resources - which will result in overload and access problem. This increased signaling overhead and diverse requirements of machine type communication devices (MTCDs) call for the development of flexible and efficient scheduling and random access techniques. In this thesis, we first review and compare various scheduling and random access techniques in LTE-based cellular networks for M2M communication. We also discuss how successful they are to fulfill the unique requirements of M2M communication and networking. Resource management in M2M networks with a large number devices is also reviewed from the access point of view. We propose a multi-objective optimization based solution to the problem of resource allocation in interference-limited M2M communication. We consider MTCDs in a clustered network structure, where they are divided into clusters and the devices belonging to a cluster communicate to cluster head (or controller). We maximize the number of admitted MTCD controllers and throughput with least interference caused to conventional primary users. We formulate the problem as a mixed-integer non-linear problem with multiple objectives and solve it using meshed adaptive direct search (MADS) algorithm. Simulation results show the effects of varying different parameters on cumulative throughput and the number of admitted iii MTCD controllers. We then formulate the slot selection problem in M2M networks with admitted MTCDs as an optimization problem. We present a solution using the Q-learning algorithm to select conflict-free slot assignment in a random access network with MTCD controllers. The performance of the solution is dependent on parameters such as learning rate and reward. We thoroughly analyze the performance of the proposed algorithm considering different parameters related to its operation. We also compare it with simple ALOHA and channel-based scheduled allocation and show that the proposed Q-learning based technique has a higher probability of assigning slots compared to these techniques. We then present a block based Q-learning algorithm for the scheduling of MTCDs in clustered M2M communication networks. At first centralized slot assignment is done and an algorithm is proposed for minimizing the inter-cluster interference. Then we propose to use an Q-learning algorithm to assign slots in a distributed manner and comparison is made between the two schemes. Afterwards, we show the effects of distributed slot-assignment with respect to varying signal-to-interference ratio on convergence rate and convergence probability. Cumulative distribution function is used to study the effect of various SIR threshold levels on the convergence probability. With the increase in SIR threshold levels, increase in convergence time and decrease in convergence probability are observed, as less block configuration fulfills the required threshold in the M2M network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".