MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255465900 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1070072

Imaging error

2007· article· en· W4255465900 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Eugene Weir, M. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWeirComputer graphics (images)AbdomenAngiolipomaArtificial intelligenceNuclear medicineMedicineAnatomyRadiologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[The authors respond:] We thank John Clark and other readers for drawing our attention to the error.[1][1] The correct image is provided here with the original caption. ![Figure][2] Fig. 2: CT scan of the abdomen showing renal angiolipoma (arrow). 1. 1.[↵][3] Weir E, Cohen M. A 48-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.114
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.114
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0160.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207