MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255523511 · doi:10.7213/rec.v14i33.22425

O momento decisivo no fotojornalismo atual: a importância da métis na atuação do fotógrafo

2017· article· pt· W4255523511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andréa Karinne Albuquerque Maia

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Estudos da Comunicação · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural, Media, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desde sua origem, a Fotografia tem passado por constantes transformações que interferem na atuação o fotógrafo, essas mudanças facilitam o exercício da função, ao mesmo tempo, exigem do profissional um esforço para adaptar-se à nova realidade apresentada. No fotojornalismo, o ápice do trabalho está no momento decisivo, termo criado por Henri Cartier-Bresson, compreendido como a síntese do fato jornalístico cristalizado pela imagem. O avanço tecnológico tem facilitado a captação desse momento. Sobretudo, através da filmagem em HD (high definition), e posterior seleção do fotograma que melhor representa o acontecimento. Com o objetivo de lançar um olhar sobre essa questão, recorre-se ao conceito de métis, que pode ser entendida como uma espécie de inteligência voltada para a ação prática, um conjunto complexo de atitudes mentais que envolve astúcia e prudência. Nesse sentido, considera-se que a métis é uma competência essencial para a atuação no fotojornalismo. O aporte metodológico adotado consiste na pesquisa bibliográfica sobre o tema em análise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Estudos da ComunicaçãoSame topicCultural, Media, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207