A personal narrative: encountering systemic discrimination as a status Indian hard-of-hearing male
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a community mental health crises situation on-reserve/s in the North.Specifically concerning this crises situation, there is a lack of community health services provided for Indian Reserves in Northern British Columbia by the Northern Health Authority.The main reason is because of the lack of trust by community mental health leadership on-reserve for provision of services on-reserve by the Northern Health Authority.Therefore, the leadership in the Northern Health Authority and the leadership in community mental health on Indian Reserves need to initiate new communication regarding the provision of services specifically for community mental health issues onreserve.The methodology used is a combination of Narrative/Autobiographical Research specifically addressing the writer's experiences in working with the Northern Health Authority and a non-profit community mental health agency contracted by the Northern Health Authority to provide community mental health services on-reserve in the North.The paper provides simple, clear recommendations for all parties concerned in order to address this community mental health crises situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".