MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255564659 · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2101

Isotonic Saline Expands Extracellular Fluid and Is Inappropriate for Maintenance Therapy: In Reply

2005· article· en· W4255564659 on OpenAlexaff
Ewout J. Hoorn, Mitchell L. Halperin, Desmond Bohn

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectrolyte and hormonal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIsotonic SolutionsExtracellular fluidHypernatremiaSalineHyponatremiaHypertonic salineInterstitial fluidIsotonic salineBody fluidTonicityIntravascular volume statusAnesthesiaInternal medicineSodiumExtracellularChemistryBiochemistryHemodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Reply.—Dr Holliday correctly emphasizes the important distinction between the use of intravenous (IV) fluid replacement to increase a contracted extracellular fluid (ECF) volume, with which antidiuretic hormone (ADH) secretion is frequently elevated, and fluid used to replace insensible fluid losses. We would argue that clinical evaluation of the degree of ECF contraction frequently overestimates the problem, resulting in significant volumes of IV fluid being administered,1 leading to volume overexpansion and the production of a hypertonic urine. This was seen in the study by Steele et al,2 in which the administration of large volumes of isotonic fluid led to the production of a hypertonic urine and a fall in plasma sodium (desalination). For the situation in which children are truly ECF volume contracted, Gerigk et al3 demonstrated that isotonic saline was more effective that oral rehydration or IV hypotonic saline in suppressing elevated ADH levels. We await with interest the publication of the data confirming this mentioned by Dr Holliday.We have also argued that formula used for estimating insensible losses results in the administration of excess electrolyte-free water,4 which can be particularly hazardous in patients who continue to have nonphysiologic-mediated ADH secretion. We believe that the point about the administration of isotonic saline causing hypernatremia and brain damage is not relevant in the context of IV fluid administration. The cases referred to by Dr Holliday occurred predominantly in infants with hypernatremia due to severe ECF contraction associated with large losses of free water and high hematocrits. On the contrary, the use of hypertonic saline to induce hypernatremia and a hyperosmolar state has now become commonplace in the intensive care management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury and raised intracranial pressure.If we have created the impression that all patients should receive normal saline regardless of fluid and electrolyte status, this is a misconception. We can only reiterate the concluding paragraph from our article, which states that hypotonic fluids should not be used routinely in the intraoperative or postoperative period or if a patient has a plasma sodium in the low-normal or distinctly hyponatremic range (<138 mmol/L). In addition, boluses of isotonic saline should only be given if there are clear hemodynamic indications for that infusion.5

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0340.050
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicElectrolyte and hormonal disordersFrench-language works237,207