MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255569219 · doi:10.20884/1.bioe.2019.1.2.1822

[no title]

2019· article· W4255569219 on OpenAlexaff
Annisa Mutiara Rizki, Dwi Nugroho Wibowo, Wiwik Herawati

Bibliographic record

VenueBioEksakta Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Unsoed · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHorticultureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perkebunan tebu Pusat Penelitian Agronomi (Puslitagro) Jatitujuh Majalengka merupakan salah satu perkebunan tebu yang menanam tebu jenis lahan kering. Gulma adalah masalah utama yang dihadapi pada budidaya tebu lahan kering. Kehadiran gulma akan mempersulit pemeliharaan dan panen serta menurunkan kualitas penebangan tebu, baik yang dilakukan secara manual maupun mekanik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui komposisi dan keanekaragaman spesies gulma di daerah perkebunan tebu Puslitagro Jatitujuh Majalengka sebagai dasar dalam pengendalian gulma dan mengetahui faktor-faktor lingkungan abiotik di lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, keanekaragaman spesies gulma di Perkebunan Tebu Pusitagro Jatitujuh Majalengka terdapat 46 spesies yang terdiri dari 16 famili. Kemerataan gulma tergolong tinggi, dari data yang didapat masing-masing area lebih dari satu. Area Kidang Kencana Timur (1,94) tergolong tinggi, area Kidang Kencana Tengah (1,89) tergolong tinggi, dan area Rancabugang (1,83) tergolong tinggi. Keanekaragaman spesies gulma tertinggi terdapat pada area Kidang Kencana Timur (3,15) dengan suhu udara 30°C, kelembaban tanah 75%, dan pH tanah netral (7,1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioEksakta Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi UnsoedSame topicPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesFrench-language works237,207