MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Web Divide and Paper Unite

2013· book-chapter· en· W4255584291 on OpenAlexaff
Francisco V. Cipolla-Ficarra, Miguel Cipolla-Ficarra, Jacqueline Alma, Alejandra Quiroga

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in human and social aspects of technology book series · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Applications and Data Management
Canadian institutionsElectronic Arts (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperReading (process)World Wide WebThe InternetComputer scienceMultimediaQuality (philosophy)AdvertisingPolitical scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present the first results of a study intending to unify the quality criteria of the local touristic information in digital support (Internet) and analog (paper). An analysis is made of the reading preferences of touristic information on last generation digital screens (tablet PC and multimedia mobile phones), traditional (desktop computers), and analog (brochures, magazines, and newspapers).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2160.068

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in human and social aspects of technology book seriesSame topicWeb Applications and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207