MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255606380 · doi:10.4095/292211

Geology, Mahony Lake (northwest), Northwest Territories

2013· report· en· W4255606380 on OpenAlexaffabout
K M Fallas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPhysical geographyArchaeologyGeomorphologyHydrology (agriculture)GeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The northwest quadrant of the Mahony Lake map area (NTS 96-F) encompasses a low, vegetated plateau at the western edge of the Great Bear Plain, Northwest Territories. The somewhat higher ground between Mahony Lake and the Hare Indian River to the north is informally referred to as the Mahony dome. Most of the area is underlain by broadly folded Paleozoic carbonate strata, disrupted locally by steep reverse faults. The structural features suggest a geological kinship with the Franklin Mountains to the west. Due to a veneer of unconsolidated Quaternary deposits, bedrock exposures are not abundant; however, the presence of carbonate very close to surface has allowed for the development of numerous karst features, such as sinkholes, disappearing streams, and turloughs, where bedrock may be exposed. Cretaceous siliciclastic strata are preserved in a synclinal structure west of Mahony Lake. Truncations of Ordovician to Devonian strata beneath the sub-Cretaceous unconformity delineate part of the Keele Arch, a feature that stood topographically higher than the surrounding area before deposition of the Devonian strata, and again before deposition of the Cretaceous strata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207