MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255618851 · doi:10.1017/s2040470013000083

ABS volume 4 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

2013· paratext· en· W4255618851 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Animal Biosciences · 2013
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInterregScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research CollaborationLandwirtschaftliche RentenbankFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroInternational Atomic Energy AgencyConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoQueensland GovernmentMinistry of Business, Innovation and EmploymentNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaRural Development AdministrationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloAustralian GovernmentAgence Nationale de la RechercheDSM Nutritional ProductsAlberta Livestock and Meat AgencyMeat and Livestock AustraliaQueensland University of TechnologyGardiner FoundationCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationUniversity of CambridgeAustralian Wool InnovationUtah State UniversityLa Trobe UniversityEli Lilly and CompanyNew Zealand GovernmentDepartment of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australian GovernmentDairy Farmers of CanadaMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK GovernmentPfizerGrains Research and Development CorporationAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsDirection Générale Opérationnelle Agriculture, Ressources Naturelles et Environnement du Service Public de WallonieNew Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research CentreInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaNational Research FoundationTeagascU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Environmental scienceGeologyPhysicsEngineeringThermodynamicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enteric methane emission from ruminants contributes substantially to the greenhouse effect. Few studies have focused on the genetic variation in enteric methane emission from dairy cattle. One reason for that is the limited<br/>number of methods appropriate for large scale phenotyping to measure a sufficient number of animals available to estimation of additive genetic variance. A method to measure methane in dairy cattle using a Fourier Transformed Infrared (FTIR) approach during milking in Automatic milking systems was implemented by Lassen et al . (2012). Such data showed repeatability estimates around 0.40 for the ratio between methane and carbon dioxide concentrations. Using the ratio between methane and carbon dioxide as a phenotype makes it possible to quantify the amount of methane produced<br/>per cow, because the amount of carbon dioxide can be estimated from variables such as weight, milk production and feed intake (Madsen et al<br/>., 2010). In a study of 548 heifers a heritability estimate of 0.35 was obtained for predicted methane emission based on registrations on feed intake rather than on direct measurements (de Haas et al., 2011). Estimates of this<br/>magnitude justify the use of genetic tools to reduce methane emission from dairy cattle. Another study (Wall et al ., 2010) has shown that selecting for correlated indicator traits such as productivity and efficiency would help lowering the methane emission from the cattle production. Furthermore, it is still important to have emphasis on production traits through use of a<br/>total merit indexes to avoid a decline in economically important traits when reducing methane emission. However, key genetic parameters are still inaccurate and would therefore benefit from being re-estimated on larger numbers of animals and records based on reliable direct methods. The objective of this study was to estimate the heritability for enteric methane<br/>emission from Danish Holstein cows using a non-invasive method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1310.287

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it