Perspectivas éticas en el manejo de la pandemia COVID-19 y de su impacto en la salud mental
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En tanto que componente fundamental del quehacer médico a lo largo de la historia, la Ética es aún más prominente en situaciones de emergencia en salud pública. Luego de exponer los principios éticos esenciales y de enfatizar su valor en el cuidado médico de todo ser humano, se plantea la inevitable tensión que su aplicación genera en los diversos contextos de la relación médico-paciente. Se presta especial atención a las distinciones de la perspectiva ética en casos individuales y en el ámbito colectivo o de salud pública, particularmente en el curso de emergencias masivas como la desencadenada por COVID-19. A la luz de recientes documentos nacionales e internacionales, se discute el inevitable advenimiento de nuevas normas que deberán incluir aspectos socio-culturales, psicobiológicos y legales poseedores de un impacto clínico altamente significativo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".