MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255626641 · doi:10.1179/cim.2001.2.1.30

Scalp thickness in the temporal region: its relevance to the development of cochlear implants

2001· article· en· W4255626641 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCochlear Implants International · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsIllumisonics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriosteumScalpSkullTemporal boneMastoid processAnatomyMagnetic resonance imagingCochlear implantMedicineOrbit (dynamics)AudiologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thickness of the scalp in the temporal region was measured at two representative points: point 1, over the most laterally prominent part of the mastoid process: and point 2, at the horizontal level of the upper border of the orbit, vertically in line with point 1. Measurements were made directly at autopsy in four patients, then in 50 live patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The relevance of the methodology and of these measurements to cochlear implant development is discussed. As the term 'scalp' usually includes the periosteum of the skull, the authors have used the term 'scalp' to include the range from the surface of the scalp to the bone shadow as seen on MRI, and the term 'skin' where, at autopsy, the skin is lifted leaving the periosteum intact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it