MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4255657203 · doi:10.24124/2009/bpgub628

The role of weather and topography in the development of Dothistroma septosporum.

2009· dissertation· en· W4255657203 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Crystal Braun

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsOutbreakBlightGeographyBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dothistroma septosporum (Dorog.) Morelet is recognized worldwide as a foliar disease of pine trees, infecting needles and causing premature defoliation. This results in reduced growth of the tree and, in severe cases, death. Red banding, caused by the mycotoxin dothistromin, along needles where infection has been successful characterizes this fungal pathogen. Symptoms develop sooner with higher temperatures and longer wetness periods. In a severe outbreak of Dothistroma needle blight in the Skeena Stikine Forest District in northwestern British Columbia (BC), damage has ranged from low levels of infection to nearly 100% mortality. A high concentration of young susceptible hosts and warm, moist summers and cool, wet falls in this area are thought to be contributing to the outbreak. Heavy fogs that persist in plantations close to rivers, lakes, or streams may also facilitate D. septosporum development. The purpose of this research is to identify climatic and site conditions contributing to the development of Dothistroma needle blight with respect to the severe outbreak happening in northwestern BC. The main objectives are to monitor the variation in disease expression, identify the ranges of temperature and humidity conducive to disease development, and identify site factors associated with disease. In the Skeena Stikine Forest District four sites were selected according to signs of Dothistroma infection, accessibility, and the presence of trees within 10-25 years of age. Within each site, three plots were established for weekly monitoring. In each of the twelve plots, weather stations were set up and six trees were selected. Six plots also had leaf wetness sensors. On each tree, four cohorts of ten needles were marked. These needles were examined weekly for the development of red bands, fruiting bodies, and spore production. When fruiting bodies were detected, needles were extracted from the tree for dissection to determine their reproductive state. Survey data of lodgepole pine plantations in the Skeena Stikine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→