Bibliographic record
Abstract
Buscando reconstituir parte de la historia del concepto de creatividad, este artículo retrocede en el tiempo y se ubica a partir de la lucha que enfrentó a griegos y troyanos. En este pasado remoto encontramos la figura del primer pensador creativo del que tenemos recuerdo, conservada gracias al canto público de poetas errantes de prodigiosa memoria, que luego fue la base de textos que aún podemos leer. Se trata de Ulises, cuya sinuosa vida está muy bien documentada, considerando la distancia que nos separa de ella. Transgrediendo prácticas habituales y esquemas consagrados de su época, Ulises introdujo sistemáticamente nuevas formas de enfrentar los peligros y resolver los problemas. En cada acción representó un ejemplo de prudencia, flexibilidad y capacidad de respuesta, pero en sus empeños jamás sometió el núcleo permanente de su existencia, su sentido de vida, a ganancias pasajeras. Ningún poeta habla todavía de creatividad, o de pensamiento creativo, en cambio encontramos el vocablo metis, seguramente su antecedente más lejano. El texto arranca definiendo un contexto en forma narrativa, y evoluciona gradualmente a un formato más argumentativo y conceptual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.591 | 0.413 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".