MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255743104 · doi:10.1002/wcm.485

DSP implementation of a bit loading algorithm for adaptive wireless multicarrier transceivers

2007· article· en· W4255743104 on OpenAlexaff
M. Cudnoch, Alexander M. Wyglinski, Fabrice Labeau

Bibliographic record

VenueWireless Communications and Mobile Computing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransceiverSubcarrierWirelessRobustness (evolution)Channel (broadcasting)AlgorithmBit error rateDigital signal processingComputer hardwareReal-time computingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we present a proof‐of‐concept, fixed‐point, DSP hardware implementation of an adaptive bit loading algorithm that is designed for wireless multicarrier transceivers. Adaptive bit loading is used to enhance the performance of multicarrier transceivers by tailoring the subcarrier signal constellations to the channel conditions, which can vary across the subcarriers. Since most bit loading algorithms possess a high computational cost and are unable to cope with rapid variations of wireless channels, they are seldom used in present wireless standards. To prove that adaptive bit loading is feasible for wireless transceivers, our work focuses on the implementation of a known bit loading algorithm that can quickly search for the final bit allocation in an iterative manner. The goal of this algorithm is to yield the largest‐possible throughput while satisfying a mean BER constraint. The performance of the hardware implementation operating in time‐varying channel conditions is studied in terms of the overall throughput. Furthermore, the robustness of the hardware implementation is evaluated, relative to sudden changes in the channel that interrupts the run of the algorithm. Real‐time operations and fixed‐point representation issues are included in the discussion. Additionally, we propose a modified algorithm implementation that is more robust to channel variations. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWireless Communications and Mobile ComputingSame topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207