MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2013· book-chapter· en· W4255781377 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and information science · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation literacyPublishingLiteracyCitationSociologyLibrary sciencePublic relationsPsychologyPolitical sciencePedagogyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2013), "Preface", Developing People’s Information Capabilities: Fostering Information Literacy in Educational, Workplace and Community Contexts (Library and Information Science, Vol. 8), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. xix-xxi. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-0562(2013)0000008004 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Information literacy has been at the core of both Mark Hepworth’s and Geoff Walton’s research for over 15 years. This interest stemmed from working with groups of people either as researchers in information literacy and people’s information behaviour, or as information service providers and capacity builders. This experience has focused their attention on both people’s need for information and also their ability to acquire and process information. This book is aimed at both academics who are interested in exploring the various facets of information literacy and librarians or other professionals, such as teachers or extension workers and capacity builders whose role it is to help others develop their information literacy. Our information literacy research has stemmed from an academic desire to understand this phenomena, that is ‘what is it?’, ‘what influences a person information literacy?’, ‘does it mean different things in different contexts?’ and so on. The second driver was the need to find practical ways of developing people’s information literacy, that is drawing on academic insight to help develop effective interventions that would build information literacy. Both Mark and Geoff teach information literacy to undergraduates and post-graduates as well as outside the educational environment, including the workplace and the community. This combination of research and practice is, in a sense, a necessity because information literacy and the teaching of information literacy is a relatively new phenomena and we are all still learning about the nature of information literacy and also about the ways to enable people to develop these capabilities. This book therefore reflects the embedded nature of information literacy, the significance of experience and the need to concretise the abstract often nebulous, and primarily unconscious conceptions and processes associated with information literacy. Knowledge and understanding of information literacy is still evolving, as are the methods and techniques to build information capabilities. One thing we are clear about is that information literacy is far more complex than it was conceived 15 years ago, where the focus was on discreet skills associated with using libraries and library resources. The latter is, of course, important but we now appreciate how information literacy can be tackled from various perspectives, for example, the focus may be the individual and their capabilities and their information experience, or alternatively information literacies may be related to being part of a group of people, such as a team or organisation or community group where certain behaviours and attitudes maybe particularly important, such as the sharing of information. Furthermore information literacy can be approached from different perspectives, such as, cultural, cognitive, behavioural or focusing on the information landscape and people’s knowledge of and interaction with information artefacts, people and other ways of becoming informed. To help get an overview of conceptions of information literacy today and an appreciation of its complexity we wanted to encourage contributions from authors who are recognised as making a significant contribution to the field. These included people who, over the last few years, have contributed books, journals articles, maintained Web-based resources on IL, and are regular contributors to conferences such as the Librarians Information Literacy Annual Conference (LILAC) and the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) conference. The authors were asked to contribute a chapter based on their research and/or current practice that would help readers to get a taste of recent approaches to developing people’s information literacy and also an international perspective on information literacy from authors around the world. In particular authors were encouraged who also appreciated the richness and complexity of information literacy, its socially embedded nature and the importance of context. The latter stemmed from a belief that, although at a high level, categories of information literacy phenomena are common and generalisable, such as broad processes like ‘acquiring information’ or ‘processing information’ or ‘critically evaluating information’, there are others that are more important in specific contexts, such as ‘dealing with information securely’ or may involve radically different types of information and interaction. When we first thought about this volume we agreed that it has to travel beyond higher education and the ‘northern’ perspective and to incorporate both practitioner narratives as well as theoretical. We felt that it needed to embrace the workplace, the community and involve authors who have carried out research in both the developing world and emerging economies. Capacity or capability building was another issue we wanted to address to demonstrate how information literacy is not just a set of skills but is actually a set of cognitive heuristics that can be applied to any task or context. We are delighted to say that the authors we recruited from all four continents have done a fine job in reporting and critiquing their work. The chapters contained are naturally diverse and wide ranging covering different locations, such as Australia, Brazil, Hong Kong, Thailand, Tanzania, Malaysia, Singapore, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States and specific contexts such as enabling Alaska’s indigenous Inuit population to develop legal information literacy. We are not aware of any previous work done on faith and information literacy and this is an example of groundbreaking work that we were delighted to include. Naturally, we also wanted a strong theoretical foundation and that has been provided in the first three chapters although theoretical assumptions are either evident or explicit in other chapters. Our opening chapter also presents an argument for bringing together the domains of information literacy and information behaviour and indicates how they are complementary and both would benefit from each other’s work. We would therefore like to thank the contributors, who sacrificed the time to write their chapters and enabled the reader to share the experience of active researchers and teachers and trainers information literacy from around the world. Several authors were brave enough to do this even though English was not their first language. It has been a privilege to be able to see information literacy through fresh eyes, either due to authors unpicking specific aspects of information literacy or showing its significance in different contexts, as well practical ideas for how to effectively foster information literacy among others and implement interventions. We would also like to thank the editorial team at Emerald for their patience and help with the production of this book. Mark Hepworth Geoff Walton Editors Book Chapters Developing People’s Information Capabilities: Fostering Information Literacy in Educational, Workplace and Community Contexts Library and Information Science Developing People’s Information Capabilities: Fostering Information Literacy in Educational, Workplace and Community Contexts Copyright Page List of Contributors Editorial Advisory Board Preface Chapter 1 Introduction — Information Literacy and Information Behaviour, Complementary Approaches for Building Capability Chapter 2 Transforming Information Literacy for Higher Education in the 21st Century: A Lifelong Learning Approach Chapter 3 Curriculum and Curriculum Integration of Information Literacy in Higher Education Chapter 4 The Construction of Information and Media Literacy in Education Policy: A Study of Singapore Chapter 5 Information Literacy in Higher Education: Research Students’ Development in Information Search Expertise Chapter 6 Mediating Culture: Media Literacy and Cultural Awareness The Representation of Race and Ethnicity in Maya and Miguel Chapter 7 Empowering Professional Practices of a Community of e-Learners: Special Education Teachers in Alaska and their Information Literacy Conceptions Chapter 8 Information Literacy of Undergraduate Students in Thailand: A Case of the Faculty of Arts, Silpakorn University, Thailand Chapter 9 Building Partnerships for Information Literacy among HE Institutions in African Universities: Opportunities and Challenges — A Case Study Chapter 10 Perspectives on Legal Education and the Role of Information Literacy in Improving Qualitative Legal Practice Chapter 11 Information Literacy in the Business School Context: A Story of Complexity and Success Chapter 12 Workplace Reflections of Information Literacy Training: The Case of the Agriculture and Health Sectors in Tanzania Chapter 13 Workplace Information Literacy: It’s Different Chapter 14 Diversifying Information Literacy Research: An Informed Learning Perspective Chapter 15 The Use of Participatory Techniques in the Communication of Information for Communities: Information Literacy and Collaborative Work for Citizenship Development About the Authors Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.449
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and information scienceSame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207