MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255790501 · doi:10.5539/sar.v5n4p113

Reviewer Acknowledgements for Sustainable Agriculture Research, Vol. 5, No. 4

2016· article· en· W4255790501 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Agriculture Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceAgricultureAgricultural scienceAnimal scienceLibrary scienceGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sustainable Agriculture Research wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Their help and contributions in maintaining the quality of the journal are greatly appreciated. Sustainable Agriculture Research is recruiting reviewers for the journal. If you are interested in becoming a reviewer, we welcome you to join us. Please find the application form and details at http://www.ccsenet.org/reviewer and e-mail the completed application form to sar@ccsenet.org. Reviewers for Volume 5, Number 4 Aftab Alam, Vice President Agriculture (R&D), Edenworks Inc. New York, United States Amor Slama, Science Faculty of Bizerte, Tunisia Bernard Palmer Kfuban Yerima, University of Dschang, Cameroon Beye Amadou Amadou Moustapha, Rice Research Center, C?te d'Ivoire Carlos Enrrik Pedrosa, Alis-Bom Despacho-MG, Brazil Gema Parra, Universidad de Jaén, Spain Inder Pal Singh Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University (GADVASU), India Kleber Campos Miranda-Filho, UFMG, Brazil Mrutyunjay Swain, Sardar Patel University, India Murtazain Raza, Subsidiary of Habib Bank AG Zurich, Pakistan S. Dharumarajan, Scientist, National Bureau of soil survey and land use planning, Bangalore, India

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.268
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.268
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1380.092

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable Agriculture ResearchSame topicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsFrench-language works237,207