MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255804069 · doi:10.1109/eumc.2007.4405392

A 3 GHz CMOS quadrature oscillator using active superharmonic coupling

2007· article· en· W4255804069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2007 European Microwave Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsdBcPhase noiseQuadrature (astronomy)CMOSHarmonicsFigure of meritSubharmonic functionPhysicsElectrical engineeringOffset (computer science)Electronic engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceOptoelectronicsVoltageMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3 GHz quadrature oscillator has been designed, fabricated, and measured using CMOS 0.18 mum technology. The oscillator uses an active superharmonic coupling technique to generate the quadrature signals. By using two identical LC differential oscillators with a 180deg relationship enforced between the second-order harmonics that are present at the common- mode nodes, quadrature outputs are obtained at the fundamental frequency. Quadrature oscillations were achieved at 3.0 GHz with a measured output power of -6 dBm. The phase error in the fundamental quadrature outputs is less than 6deg and the power consumption for the core of the oscillator is 7.5 mW. The phase noise performance is -116 dBc/Hz at a 1 MHz offset and the figure of merit is -177 dBc/Hz. The layout for this circuit is very compact at 650 mum times 500 mum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it