Ethnicity and Territorial Politics in Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nigeria, unlike the United States, but in common with Canada and Germany, gives an important role to Executive Federalism. This is a practice in which the heads of the state, province or land governments consult regularly with the President in an advisory role in the formulation of federal policy. In the United States, in contrast, the State Governors have all met together with the President on only three occasions since the inauguration of Washington in 1789. In Nigeria the constitution expressly provides for a National Economic Council, where the Governors of each state meet together with the CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES Directorate for Social Mobilisation, PMB 27, Abuja) Dent, M. J. (989), Federalism in Africa with special reference to Nigeria. In Nwabueze, B. O. (983), Federalism in Nigeria under the Presidential Constitution (London: Sweet and Maxwell) Repolts of Constitution Drafting Committee (1972) (Lagos: Federal Ministry of Information) Third National Development Plan (Lagos: Central Planning Office, Ministry of Economic Development, 1975-80) West A/rica, 2-8 September, 1991 West A/rica, 27 September-3 October, 1993, p. 1724
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".