MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255826969 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db260384

Fears of higher US inflation and rates are exaggerated

2021· other· en· W4255826969 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Technological Developments in Russia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflation (cosmology)Scope (computer science)ProductivityEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)Control (management)Monetary economicsScale (ratio)Monetary policyMacroeconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Prominent economists disagree on whether this will fire inflation. The Federal Reserve (Fed) is for the moment prioritising economic growth and employment over price control. It sees inflation reaching 2.4% in 2021. Impacts The bill funds schemes long desired by Democrats; child support and better medical coverage will raise personal incomes and productivity. Expectations of 10-year inflation suggest prices will not accelerate in the future, as markets bet that the Fed will maintain control. The scope for large-scale borrowing is narrowing; the next item on the government’s agenda, infrastructure, will require tax increases. Seven of the Fed’s 18 policymakers expect a rate hike by end-2023; their number may increase as second-quarter data are released.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicEconomic and Technological Developments in RussiaFrench-language works237,207