Bibliographic record
Abstract
History A 55-year-old man with a history of chronic pancreatitis secondary to chronic alcohol abuse presented to the hospital with acute abdominal pain, generalized weakness, weight loss, and pyrexia. A clinical examination revealed he was tender to touch in the upper abdomen. Laboratory tests revealed a serum alkaline phosphatase level of 370 U/L (6.1 µkat/L) (normal range, 30–130 U/L [0.5–2.2 µkat/L]), a lipase level of 172 U/L (2.9 µkat/L) (normal range, 0–60 U/L [0–1.0 µkat/L]), a C-reactive protein level of 159 mg/L (1514 nmol/L) (normal value, <8.0 mg/L [76.2 nmol/L]), and a white cell count of 7 × 109/L (normal range, [4–11] × 109/L). During the present admission, the patient underwent urgent CT for his acute symptoms. His relevant medical history included a hospital admission 2 months earlier for abdominal discomfort. Given his history of chronic pancreatitis, baseline abdominal MRI was performed to determine the cause of his symptoms and to assess the pancreas (Figs 1–3). Figure 1a:(a, b) Images from axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 1000/87; section thickness, 6 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission. (c, d) Images from axial fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI (3.69/1.62; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen acquired 60 seconds after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mL per kilogram of body weight; Magnevist; Bayer Healthcare, East Mississauga, Ontario) during the current admission. Figure 1b:(a, b) Images from axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 1000/87; section thickness, 6 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission. (c, d) Images from axial fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI (3.69/1.62; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen acquired 60 seconds after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mL per kilogram of body weight; Magnevist; Bayer Healthcare, East Mississauga, Ontario) during the current admission. Figure 1c:(a, b) Images from axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 1000/87; section thickness, 6 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission. (c, d) Images from axial fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI (3.69/1.62; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen acquired 60 seconds after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mL per kilogram of body weight; Magnevist; Bayer Healthcare, East Mississauga, Ontario) during the current admission. Figure 1d:(a, b) Images from axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 1000/87; section thickness, 6 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission. (c, d) Images from axial fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI (3.69/1.62; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen acquired 60 seconds after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mL per kilogram of body weight; Magnevist; Bayer Healthcare, East Mississauga, Ontario) during the current admission. Figure 2: Coronal T2-weighted MRI (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 1000/89; section thickness, 4 mm) of the upper abdomen obtained 2 months prior to admission. Figure 3: Coronal CT image of the abdomen acquired 60 seconds after administration of intravenous contrast material (100 mL of iohexol, Omnipaque 350; GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ). This CT examination was performed during the current admission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".