MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clustering Analysis and Algorithms

2008· book-chapter· en· W4255861431 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAdvanced Scientific Research Methods
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisSingle-linkage clusteringComputer scienceData miningCluster (spacecraft)Pattern recognition (psychology)Similarity (geometry)Consensus clusteringSet (abstract data type)Artificial intelligenceCorrelation clusteringCURE data clustering algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clustering is the process of grouping a collection of objects (usually represented as points in a multidimensional space) into classes of similar objects. Cluster analysis is a very important tool in data analysis. It is a set of methodologies for automatic classification of a collection of patterns into clusters based on similarity. Intuitively, patterns within the same cluster are more similar to each other than patterns belonging to a different cluster. It is important to understand the difference between clustering (unsupervised classification) and supervised classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGI Global eBooksSame topicAdvanced Scientific Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207