MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4255881997 · doi:10.4324/9780203402610-7

Transformable Personal Space within a Communal Setting: Housing for the Homeless

2003· book-chapter· en· W4255881997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Faculty of Communication and Design Filiz Klassen School of Interior Design

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Personal spaceSociologyPsychologyComputer scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The condition of the ever-increasing homeless population in the urban core of Toronto provides an opportunity around which to base a discussion on the issue of transportable architectural design. The situation of more or less permanent displacement from a fixed living condition raises questions about conventional assumptions and approaches to housing in architecture and interior design. Issues of private and public space, individual and community, shelter and home, gender and personal space, personal security, relative stability and mobility-all must be reinterpreted when the perspective of the forced mobility of homelessness becomes the basis of design. Strachan House is a special needs housing project where the city’s chronically homeless have been actively involved in the planning and construction of their ‘home’. This involvement led to the re-examination of conventional design assumptions about housing in the making of an alternative communal structure that accommodates the conditions of a transient culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism→French-language works237,207→