MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255919983 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/hrve9

Sampurasun Dedy Mulyadi: Lokalitas Sunda vs Islamisasi FPI (Revised; 7 September 2017)

2017· preprint· id· W4255919983 on OpenAlexaff
Annisa Maharani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Konsep resolusi konflik membawa kecemasan tersendiri dengan bahaya kooptasi yang ditimbulkannya yaitu ke arah yang akan membawa kekakuan makna konflik dimana orang-orang akan menjadikannya sebagai isu kepentingan dan legitimasi. Hal ini disebabkan karena resolusi konflik tidak sejalan dengan advocacy. Resolusi konflik tidak dapat mengantisipasi perubahan yang akan terjadi sebagai akibat dari resolusi konflik tersebut. Konflik bermula ketika Dedi Mulyadi selalu menggunakan salam sunda yaitu Sampurasun disetiap pertemuan atau acara, sehingga hal tersebut membuat FPI mengira bahwa Dedi Mulyadi telah melupakan nilai-nilai agama Islam yang merupakan agama dirinya sendiri.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslamic Studies and RadicalismFrench-language works237,207