MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255929163 · doi:10.24124/2016/1252

Seen and not heard: the case against Mariá de Cazalla

2016· dissertation· en· W4255929163 on OpenAlexaff
Marina Lee-Anne Stuparyk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Women Writers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeScrutinyEliteGender studiesReligious studiesSociologyHistoryPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the sixteenth century, rulers responded to perceived threats against Catholicism, complicating the religious climate in Spain. The Inquisition’s establishment affected all people in Spain, not just the elite. The development of gendered ideals and the theological response to concerns that the Church faced complicated the role that women played as second and third orders within the church. Religious women faced increased scrutiny and tighter control which concerned their gender more than their theological beliefs. The heretical charges levied against María de Cazalla concerned her status as a mother and wife and her insistence on assuming an authorial role as a teacher within her community. Maria's defense hinged on her understanding of gendered ideals in response to her perceived role as a woman. Its success rested on her own application of these ideals as a woman and how she responded to the Inquisition’s expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEarly Modern Women WritersFrench-language works237,207