Effect of Axial Deformation Caused by Torsion on a Solid Steel Cylinder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Equations describing the classical theory of applied torsion and axial rotation on a solid cylindrical shaft have been modified by Shirali and Hossain (2019) to derive new theorems, which can take into consideration axial deformation of members. The modified theorems use various empirical parameters to introduce the combined effect of axial force, axial displacement and axial rotation, which is neglected in classical theorems of torsion. Multiple finite element analysis models for solid steel cylindrical members, fixed at one end and subjected to torsion at its free end, were developed to study the effects of torsional loading. The effect of axial deformation/stress developed in the cylinder is analyzed and compared with values predicted by classical and proposed modified theorems (equations). It is shown that the cylinder can shorten or elongate when subjected to torsion. The proposed theorems/equations, based on axial deformation subjected to torsion, provide more accurate predictions of shear stress and axial rotation (angle of twist).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".