MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4255960458 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.101624

Informative and compelling online history of medicare

2010· article· en· W4255960458 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Heather MacDougall, D. Gallacher

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Research and Practices
Canadian institutionsMusée de la CivilisationUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careNarrativeData scienceComputer scienceWorld Wide WebMedicinePolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

M aking Medicare: The History of Health Care in Canada, 1914–2007 ([www.civilization.ca/medicare][1]) is a balanced, visually attractive and informative narrative of the slow process of developing and implementing hospital and medical services insurance programs in Canada. Launched in April 2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicMedical Research and PracticesFrench-language works237,207