MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2016· article· W4256029544 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacob F. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueMichigan Historical Review · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhetoricIndigenousHistoryHistoriographyPolitical scienceSovereigntyColonialismSociologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

102 The Michigan Historical Review a societal creation—the work of numerous people who were not always working toward the same goal” (p 11). Nevertheless, the contradictory rhetoric, impulses, desires, means, and policy still “facilitated the dispossession and relocation of thousands of men, women, and children over the course of decades” (p. 11). Across seven chapters—that range from the violence of the early republic, the rhetoric of removal and federal policy, the Delawares’ response to Euro-American expansion, a localized study of the Sandusky River region of Ohio, an exploration of the 1833 Treaty of Chicago, and finally, an analysis of the Odawa and Ojibwe experience in Michigan— Land Too Good For Indians offers a compelling and engaging portrait of a far-flung region and a diverse array of experiences. Deeply researched and eloquently argued, Bowes, despite his protestation that his book cannot be all things to everybody, succeeds in doing much to re-imagine the lower Great Lakes. And, in doing so, he reveals a vibrant history of Indian removal that transcends both historiographical assumptions and periodization and shows how Indian removal was not an isolated event but an ongoing process that connects past and present. By the end of the book, Bowes reminds his readers that “The relationship between American Indian nations and the United States has never consisted of a one-sided conversation” (p. 234). And he reminds us that despite the continuance of settler colonialism, the Indigenous leaders and members of “sovereign nations are in a better position to make people listen to what they are saying” (p. 234). Justin Carroll Indiana University East Gregory Evans Dowd. Groundless: Rumors, Legends, and Hoaxes on the Early American Frontier. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015. Pp. 391. Illustrations. Index. Notes. Cloth: $34.95. That rumors filled conversations, letters, and newspapers in early America should surprise no one familiar with the period. Uncertainty defined much of the information that circulated among Native Americans, Europeans, and Africans during colonial encounters. In Groundless, Gregory Evans Dowd follows recurring rumors along “longitudes” running through time, while also pausing to explore specific “episodes” in depth (p. 14). In doing so, he demonstrates that “rumors Book Reviews 103 both shaped and reflected perceptions” of early America and subsequently influenced understandings of the past (p. 2). Dowd shows that the falsehoods and fabrications that people believed and repeated played on legitimate hopes and fears. As he writes, “Rumors only gain speed, they can only take flight, in a medium of plausibility” (p. 146). Indeed, the most widespread tales hinted at broader truths, even when the rumor itself was false. Spain grew rich off Aztec wealth during the conquest of Mexico; perhaps gold would be found in eastern North America. Smallpox and other diseases spread with the arrival of Europeans; perhaps those epidemics were the products of schemes to exterminate Native Americans. Carolina built a society based on chattel slavery; perhaps the English intended to enslave entire Indian nations in the South. Throughout early America, rumors grew out of real possibilities. Rumors also drove action. In 1838, at the height of Indian Removal, white Michiganders discovered the burned-out cabin and charred remains of three members of a frontier family. Rumor charged nearby Anishinaabe Indians with the crime. Indian agent Henry Schoolcraft “leveraged the accusations” to push for rapid expulsion of Indians from the state, even as evidence indicated the victims died from domestic violence, not Indian attack (p. 254). Meanwhile, the Anishinaabeg shared their own stories about murder, specifically that the United States intended to deport or exterminate them. In response, many Anishinaabeg crossed the border into British Canada, and the specter of their alliance with Britain forced the United States to back away from its intention to forcibly remove them. As time passed, rumor became legend and even history. During the American Revolution, colonists accused the British of buying American scalps from their Indian allies, even while knowing that Britons and Indians had no monopoly on scalping. South Carolina and Pennsylvania offered bounties for scalps, and American troops lifted the hair of their Indian enemies. In 1782, Pennsylvania militia committed the war’s worst atrocity, murdering and mutilating more than ninety noncombatants at...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMichigan Historical ReviewSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207